- #Nixon visits china wikipedia skin
- #Nixon visits china wikipedia trial
- #Nixon visits china wikipedia free
“I view the WikiLeaks publications of 20 to be of comparable importance.” “My own actions in relation to the Pentagon Papers and the consequences of their publication have been acknowledged to have performed such a radical change of understanding,” he outlined in his statement to the court.
#Nixon visits china wikipedia trial
“The people of Ellsberg’s equivalent rank and early-career promise more typically chose to serve the War on Terror, not resist it, going along with atrocities abroad and democratic destabilization at home.”Įllsberg’s tenacious advocacy for Assange, for whom he acted as witness in the extradition trial in September 2020, was fortifying. The leaks and disclosures have come from such individuals as Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden and Daniel Hale, all vitally important, yet all several steps removed from the centre of power. In the post-9/11 era, there has been no equivalent, no reputational shedding of skin.
#Nixon visits china wikipedia skin
His establishment skin would be sloughed.Īs Spencer Ackerman observes, the strength of Ellsberg’s whistleblowing was the locus of power it came from a figure so highly placed in the national security apparatus he had the ear of presidential advisors. The impression left by Kehler, far from being banally corny and naff, helped complete the Damascene conversion: the RAND employee would commit to the task of ending a war effort he had been complicit in advancing. Then came a moving talk by peace activist Randy Kehler.
#Nixon visits china wikipedia free
“I had become free of the fear of being absurd, of looking foolish, for stepping out of line.” It took a demonstration outside the trial of draft resister Bod Eaton to invest him with necessary confidence. He had initially found the participants, as he recfalls in his memoir Secrets, unduly simplistic, unnecessarily negative, dogmatic and extremist. While working at RAND, he visited Haverford College in August 1969, where his attendance at a conference of the War Resisters’ International proved turning. In a sense, he became something of a model whistleblower: a figure initially besotted, a believer in the role of US power, only to then find evidence at odds with that belief. Initially in agreement with policies in the Cold War rollback of communism, Ellsberg came to have trouble with the narrative of one’s country, right and wrong. As part of that most Nixonian of sagas, the judge also revealed that he had been offered the role of FBI director by John Ehrlichman, the President’s assistant for domestic affairs. Byrne Jr., even before the jury’s verdict was in, dismissed the action in May 1973, citing serious government misconduct (the office of Ellsberg’s psychiatrist had been burgled by the infamous “White House Plumbers”), not to mention illegal wiretapping. “The American people to whom the documents belonged in the first place? The press to whom the Pentagon Papers were given – not sold – so that they could better inform the people on how a succession of administrations had deceived them and wasted this country’s lives, resources, and honor?”
As Sheinbaum remarked, the absurdity of the charges was self-evident. Initial indictment, followed by further grand jury hearings, followed by another round of indictments.
The treatment dished out by the US national security state was very much the blueprint for what is taking place against the WikiLeaks founder. Russo had aided Ellsberg in the mammoth task of copying the papers. Both men had been analysts and researchers at the RAND Corporation, with the former tasked with nuclear wargaming scenarios. Central to this particularly vicious effort on the part of President Richard Nixon and his inner circle was the release of the Pentagon Papers, a government document running into 7,000 pages that was much at odds with public statements made by respective presidential administrations on US involvement in the Indo-China War. The charges, absurd reading then as they are now, were for conspiracy, espionage, and larceny. The Nixon administration was mustard keen to bang up Ellsberg for what would have been 115 years, and Russo for 35.
0 kommentar(er)
